Neda- I find your logo, Papiers Colle, distracting in all your pieces. Since,as you know, collage is a unity of disparate elements, in which not a single element is unnecessarily affixed, how does your logo ACT as part of the unity? Having said that, I do like this work (sans logo) very much.
Unlike Stranton, though, I don't think the watermark you have on your work is such a big deal. Watermarks are not part of the original work, and only there to discourage unauthorized commercial reproduction.
I advise all my artist friends to do the same when they post their original work, especially if it's in large format. This is now a standard on the internet. Maybe a smaller, less intrusive watermark would be more acceptable - I often find that putting in the watermark in very low opacity, and then reducing the image size is very useful.
Yes, that´s the one! a mistery to be solved...
ReplyDeleteEye love it! The textures, the folds...the EYES all conspire to have a wonderful look!
ReplyDeletebeautiful collage, very painterly.
ReplyDeleteStunning, as always!
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely gorgeous Neda!
ReplyDeleteNeda-
ReplyDeleteI find your logo, Papiers Colle, distracting in all your pieces. Since,as you know, collage is a unity of disparate elements, in which not a single element is unnecessarily affixed, how does your logo ACT as part of the unity?
Having said that, I do like this work (sans logo) very much.
The eyes speak volumes - seamless.
ReplyDeleteUnlike Stranton, though, I don't think the watermark you have on your work is such a big deal. Watermarks are not part of the original work, and only there to discourage unauthorized commercial reproduction.
I advise all my artist friends to do the same when they post their original work, especially if it's in large format. This is now a standard on the internet. Maybe a smaller, less intrusive watermark would be more acceptable - I often find that putting in the watermark in very low opacity, and then reducing the image size is very useful.
Beautiful, Neda.
ReplyDelete